• Welcome to Oxbow's blog

    Home of Entertainment|| Politics, Health tip|| Education|| Sport|| Gossip and all gist...... *wink*

    Thursday, December 22, 2016

    Iran to profit from Israel's submarine deal with ThyssenKrupp

    Israel is purchasing
    German submarines
    to protect itself
    against its archenemy
    Iran. However, the
    Islamic Republic
    stands to profit from
    the deal financially.



    In a cabinet meeting in late
    November, Israeli Prime
    Minister Benjamin
    Netanyahu emphasized that
    the new submarines were
    absolutely necessary to
    ensure Israel's existence.
    The Dolphin-class
    submarines, made by
    Germany's ThyssenKrupp
    Marine Systems (TKMS), are
    to conduct reconnaissance
    missions off the coast of
    Iran. They could also see
    action should there ever be
    a military conflict between
    the two countries.
    Israel feels threatened by
    Iran, and Iran refuses to
    acknowledge the existence
    of the state of Israel.
    Netanyahu is up in arms
    about the nuclear deal
    between Iran and the UN
    Security Council and
    Germany, which US
    President Barack Obama
    has said will make the
    world a safer place. The
    Israeli prime minister is
    convinced that Iran remains
    dedicated to becoming a
    nuclear power. Israel's new
    Dolphin-class submarines
    could also be retrofitted to
    carry nuclear warheads.
    "These are strategic
    weapons systems that
    ensure the future and, I tell
    you, the very existence of
    the state of Israel for
    decades to come," stressed
    Netanyahu.
    Iran: A major investor
    But one country will profit
    from the deal immediately:
    Iran. Israel's archenemy is
    one of ThyssenKrupp's
    investors, and it has been
    so since 1974.
    During the shah era, the
    governments of Iran and
    Israel were the best of
    friends. Both were also
    allies of the United States.
    With its coffers overflowing
    after the oil crisis of the
    early 1970s, Iran went on an
    international shopping
    spree. At the time, Iran
    invested $400 million (383
    million euros) in Germany's
    Krupp corporation,
    purchasing 25 percent of its
    shares.
    After the Islamic revolution
    in 1979, Iran entered a long
    war with Iraq. Iran needed
    cash, and sold off a portion
    of its shares. Yet it still held
    about 8 percent of the
    company's equity share.

    $100 million in
    profits?
    In 2003, that share shrunk
    further: Mohammed
    ElBaradei, then director
    general of the International
    Atomic Energy Agency
    (IAEA), published a report
    accusing Iran of hiding
    certain nuclear materials
    and activities. Under
    pressure from the US, the
    conglomerate
    ThyssenKrupp eventually
    bought back shares from
    Iran. The company saw to it
    that Iranian investments
    made up less than 5 percent
    of its equity share. To do so,
    ThyssenKrupp paid Iran 406
    million euros, which was
    three times market value at
    the time.
    Currently, Iran is thought to
    hold about 4.5 percent of
    the company's total shares.
    Responding to a DW
    inquiry, ThyssenKrupp said
    that neither Iran, nor any
    other investor, had the right
    to information or influence
    regarding sales decisions at
    the company. ThyssenKrupp
    says that investors receive
    only dividends.
    The three new submarines
    to be built for Israel will
    carry a price tag of 1.2
    billion euros. It is unclear
    how much profit Iran will
    see from the deal. The
    Israeli newspaper "Haaretz"
    estimates that Iran has
    made roughly $100 million
    dollars in profits from its
    investment in
    ThyssenKrupp over the last
    10 years. No one wants to
    talk about the investment in
    Tehran.
    Controversial in Israel
    and Germany
    Israel already has five
    Dolphin-class submarines,
    and another is scheduled to
    be delivered in 2017. The
    country's former defense
    minister, Moshe Yaalon,
    says Israel does not need
    any more submarines. "I
    was strongly opposed to the
    purchase of three new
    submarines," he said in
    November. Yaalon resigned
    in May, after a spat with
    Netanyahu.
    Meanwhile, Israel's attorney
    general has called for an
    investigation of the deal,
    which is shrouded in
    accusations of cronyism:
    Netanyahu's personal legal
    advisor also represents an
    Israeli businessman that
    works for ThyssenKrupp as
    a sales partner. He could
    stand to make millions in
    profits should the deal go
    through. It remains unclear
    whether there is any
    substance to the corruption
    allegations. Netanyahu
    claims to have known
    nothing of the connections.
    The investigation is
    ongoing.
    The fact that the Dolphin-
    class submarines could also
    be outfitted with nuclear
    warheads - a touchy issue in
    the turbulent Middle East -
    has sparked debate over the
    deal in Germany as well.
    Israel has never admitted
    that it possesses nuclear
    weapons, but experts
    estimate that it has between
    100 and 200 nuclear
    warheads and missiles.
    Iranian hardliners
    oppose the nuclear
    deal
    Israel's interest in
    purchasing three new
    submarines has given
    hardliners in Tehran one
    more reason to criticize the
    nuclear deal and accuse the
    reform-minded government
    of Hassan Rouhani of
    failure. The "Fars News
    Agency," a news outlet with
    close ties to Iran's
    Revolutionary Guard, claims
    that Israel is preparing for
    a potential nuclear war
    with Iran.
    The powerful Revolutionary
    Guard was strictly opposed
    to the nuclear deal. It was
    reported that Iran had
    enough nuclear material to
    build an atomic bomb
    before the deal was signed.
    The agreement stipulates
    that this material is to be
    reduced to just a fraction of
    that which would be
    necessary to make an
    atomic weapon. This
    limitation will remain in
    place for 15 years.
    And that is exactly where
    hardliners see Rouhani's
    failure. Netanyahu's
    intention of meeting future
    American president Donald
    Trump to discuss ending the
    agreement seems to suit the
    wishes of Iran's hardliners.
    That will bring difficulties
    for the current reform-
    minded administration in
    Tehran ahead of next May's
    Iranian presidential
    elections, and possibly
    thwart its plans to further
    open the country.
    "There are a number of
    ways to annul the deal,"
    says Netanyahu. During the
    recent US presidential
    election, Donald Trump
    called the deal - which was
    signed in July 2015, after
    years of negotiations - a
    "catastrophe."

    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Your comment is highly needed for us to know how interesting our stories/writeups are. THANKS

    Fashion

    Beauty

    Travel